<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Strategic Domain &#187; seo results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sdsearchengine.com/tag/seo-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sdsearchengine.com</link>
	<description>We Make Web Sites Search Engine Friendly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:31:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Services – In-house vs. Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.sdsearchengine.com/seo-services-in-house-vs-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sdsearchengine.com/seo-services-in-house-vs-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Peroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Slider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company Web sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-house vs. agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo service outsourcing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdsearchengine.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week I was discussing search engine optimization (SEO) services with a prospective client and he mentioned they were considering using the internal IT team to deploy the SEO initiative. From experience, I know that companies occasionally consider this as a viable option. After all, they think that they’ll save money and better manage the [...] <span class="post_excerpt_readmore"><a href="http://www.sdsearchengine.com/seo-services-in-house-vs-agency/" title="Read more">Read more &#187;</a></span><hr /><a href="http://ashford.turtleinteractive.com/download">Download Ashford for WordPress</a><hr />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week I was discussing search engine optimization (SEO) services with a prospective client and he mentioned they were considering using the internal IT team to deploy the SEO initiative.</p>
<p>From experience, I know that companies occasionally consider this as a viable option. After all, they think that they’ll save money and better manage the SEO effort.</p>
<p>I’ve learned that this is rarely the reality. IT staffers are usually working the with tight time allocations. As a result, SEO becomes a “part-time” commitment.</p>
<p>SEO is no longer a short-term activity managed by occasional IT support. To the contrary, successful SEO campaigns are carefully and continually managed over many months and ideally, the course of the year.</p>
<p>Deciding whether to execute an SEO program in-house or alternatively, with an agency that has proven ability to execute SEO should be considered very carefully.</p>
<p>Here are three points I shared with the prospective client:</p>
<ol>
<li>Agencies build up a very valuable knowledge base by serving many clients. This includes knowledge about search engine algorithms and protocols. There are few industries or practice specialties that are subject to the on-going and frequent change like search engines. A stream of new adjustments to their algorithms is common place. What worked six months ago, may not work today.</li>
<li>Top tier SEO agencies have developed a range of tools that provide valuable diagnostic information to determine if a site is search engine friendly, content opportunities as well as tracking rankings and competitors. These tools are regularly tested with a wide range of agency clients.</li>
<li>SEO agencies provide the rigor of systematic analytical reports. This establishes a way for clients to regularly keep an eye on what they are getting for their investment with the agency. In-house reporting tends to be pushed to the bottom of the client projects lists.</li>
</ol>
<p>No doubt, some client companies do have success managing this function in- house. In fact, Marketing Sherpa’s survey several years ago indicated that on average, in-house practitioners achieved a 38% increase in traffic to their Web site. Not bad. But, the survey went on the report those companies that used an agency achieved a 110% increase with their efforts.</p>
<p>If SEO is important to a company and their Web site is viewed as a contributor to its business success, then clients must carefully consider the trade offs of going in-house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sdsearchengine.com/seo-services-in-house-vs-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

